[Haskell-cafe] Re: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

[Ivan Lazar Miljenovic]

Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley at gmail.com> writes:

> I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to
> remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.

People still use Hugs? :p

A bit more seriously: is there any listing anywhere of which extensions
Hugs supports?

Definitely serious: if anything, I would care more about ensuring
compatability with JHC, UHC, etc. than Hugs nowadays.

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com