[Haskell-cafe] Re: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

[Stephen Tetley]

On 3 July 2010 14:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com> wrote:

> So this argument isn't valid ;-)

Hi Ivan

I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to
remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.