[Haskell-cafe] vector to uvector and back again

[Roman Leshchinskiy]

On 12/02/2010, at 12:39, Don Stewart wrote:

> bos:
>> I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. uvector
>> is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and it's really
>> seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, would you call
>> the vector library good enough to use in production at the moment?
> 
> uvector's not seeing much development, but at least in the last round of
> benchmarks it was still consistently faster -- since it's been
> micro-optimized.

FWIW, the development version of vector is usually faster the both uvector and dph-prim-seq, at least for the development version of NoSlow.

Roman