[Haskell-cafe] Translation of Haskell type classes
daniel.is.fischer at web.de
Thu Feb 4 13:22:25 EST 2010
Am Donnerstag 04 Februar 2010 16:32:24 schrieb Enrique Martín:
> Hello all,
> few days ago I made some experiments with Haskell type classes. I wrote
> a small Haskell program for searching in sorted lists, defining my own
> type classes for equality (MyEq) and order (MyOrd) so that they only
> have one member function:
> I made some tests in GHC 6.8.2 and I noticed that the original program
> with type classes runs pretty faster than the translated program. For
> example, reducing the expression
> search (S Z) (replicate 1000000 Z)
> needs 2.07 seconds in the original program. However the translated
> search dictMyOrdNat (S Z) (replicate 1000000 Z)
> needs 3.10 seconds in the translated program, which is one more second.
> Surprised with the results, I repeated the test this time in Hugs Sept.
> 2006. I noticed that the difference was not so big:
> search (S Z) (replicate 100000 Z) --> (2100051 reductions,
> 2798068 cells, 2 garbage collections)
> search dictMyOrdNat (S Z) (replicate 100000 Z) --> (2200051
> reductions, 2898067 cells, 3 garbage collections)
> My first idea was that type classes were implemented using the approach
> of dictionaries, but the test showed me that it is not true (mainly in
It is the approach used by GHC (you can see it by looking at the core you
get with the flag -ddump-simpl).
The point is that you ran the code interpreted. Now, dictionary-passing for
type classes is baked into the compiler, it's rather good at it even on
interpreted code, while if you implement it yourself, you get ordinary
function calls, looking up the comparison function on each iteration,
The difference disappears if you compile the code, at least with
> Then I discovered the paper "Implementing Haskell overloading",
> Augustsson 1993, when he describes some ways to improve the speed of
> Haskell overloading.
> So my questions are:
> 1) is the enhancement obtained only using the optimizations of
> Augustsson's paper?
> 2) Could anyone tell me where I can find the translation of type
> classes that GHC and Hugs use?
> Thank you very much,
> Enrique M.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe