[Haskell-cafe] On to applicative

[michael rice]

A "map" can be a function (applied to a (single) value).

Got it.

Thanks,

Michael


--- On Fri, 8/27/10, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] On to applicative
To: "michael rice" <nowgate at yahoo.com>
Cc: haskell-cafe at haskell.org
Date: Friday, August 27, 2010, 8:46 PM

On 28 August 2010 10:38, michael rice <nowgate at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> fmap seems oddly named because no "mapping" takes place, except in the fourth example, where the map is "passed in." Just sayin'.

*ahem* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_%28mathematics%29

> Prelude Control.Monad Control.Applicative Data.Char> fmap toUpper getLine
>
> <interactive>:1:13:
>     Couldn't match expected type `Char' against inferred type `[Char]'
>       Expected type: IO Char
>       Inferred type: IO String
>     In the second argument of `fmap', namely `getLine'
>     In the expression: fmap toUpper getLine

Right; this is because the fmap only gets the "Char -> Char" function
inside the IO; but since it's "IO String" rather than "IO Char", this
doesn't type-check.

--
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20100827/5c84d414/attachment.html