[Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: ipatch, the interactive patch editor

[Antoine Latter]

This would benifit darcs, as the help-text would be correct even if I've
renamed the executable. For example darcs-beta vs. darcs.

On Aug 23, 2010 3:49 PM, "Joachim Breitner" <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 23.08.2010, 13:43 -0700 schrieb Jason Dagit:
>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Joachim Breitner
>> <mail at joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
>>
>> $ ipatch split --help
>> Usage: darcs split [OPTION]... <PATCHFILE>
>>
>>
>> Darcs?
>>
>>
>>
>> $ ./dist/build/ipatch/ipatch apply --help
>> Usage: darcs apply [OPTION]... <PATCHFILE>
>>
>>
>> Darcs?
>>
>>
>> I assume those are typos left over from borrowing code?
>
> actually I’m not borrowing the code, I’m using the Darcs API, including
> the Help and Command infrastructure, which is not fully generalized yet.
> I need to have a look at the Darcs code and think of the best way of
> making it more configurable, without changing it too much or making it
> harder for Darcs itself.
>
> The function in question is getCommandHelpCore in Darcs.Commands. Maybe
> the name of the executable could be placed in the 'Command' record, then
> it would be available everywhere where needed. If someone from the Darcs
> team wants to help here, that would of course be appreciated.
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
> mail: mail at joachim-breitner.de | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Key: 4743206C
> JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20100823/56ac3ce4/attachment.html