[Haskell-cafe] Re: String vs ByteString
Erik de Castro Lopo
mle+hs at mega-nerd.com
Fri Aug 13 18:42:43 EDT 2010
Kevin Jardine wrote:
> With respect, I disagree with that approach.
>
> Almost every modern programming language has one or at most two
> standard representations for strings.
I think having two makes sense, one for arrays of arbitrary
binary bytes and one for some unicode data format, preferably
UTF-8.
> That includes PHP, Python, Ruby, Perl and many others. The lack of a
> standard text representation in Haskell has created a crazy patchwork
> of incompatible libraries requiring explicit and often inefficient
> conversions to connect them together.
>
> I expect Haskell to be higher level than those other languages so that
> I can ignore the lower level details and focus on the algorithms. But
> in fact the string issue forces me to deal with lower level details
> than even PHP requires. I end up with a program littered with ugly
> pack, unpack, toString, fromString and similar calls.
>
> That just doesn't feel right to me.
That is what I was trying to say whenI started this thread. Thank
you.
Erik
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list