[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] Monads Terminology Question
stephen.tetley at gmail.com
Mon Apr 12 16:31:22 EDT 2010
On 12 April 2010 20:43, aditya siram <aditya.siram at gmail.com> wrote:
> [SNIP] ... why not just call MonadState etc. Monad subclasses?
> "get" and "put" would then be Monad subclass functions.
At a pinch, that would tie them into their (Haskell) implementation
technique. Picking an example I'm somewhat familiar with, Andrzej
Filinski defined equivalents in SML using structures - where I think
he simply called them 'operations'.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe