[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] Monads Terminology Question

aditya siram aditya.siram at gmail.com
Mon Apr 12 15:43:23 EDT 2010

Sorry to interject a noob comment, and maybe I am not understanding
the question but why not just call MonadState etc. Monad subclasses?
"get" and "put" would then be Monad subclass functions.


On 4/12/10, Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Conor
> Chuan-kai Lin uses 'effect basis' in the ICFP paper on the Unimo
> monads, otherwise I've seen 'operations' used. I'm on the fence for
> 'effect basis' vs. 'non-proper morphisms', but biased against
> 'operations' (as its not sufficiently characteristic).
> Best wishes
> Stephen
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list