[Haskell-cafe] What is the consensus about -fwarn-unused-do-bind
?
Ivan Miljenovic
ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com
Sat Apr 10 03:07:13 EDT 2010
On 10 April 2010 00:20, Neil Brown <nccb2 at kent.ac.uk> wrote:
> The comments in that bug report actually mention "My patch does not warn on
> uses of >>, only in do-notation, where the situation is more clear cut". I
> take >> to be an explicit sign that the user wants to ignore the result of
> the first action, whereas in do-notation it may be an accident. So I think
> it was the right decision.
Ahhh, I missed that bit.
--
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list