[Haskell-cafe] What *is* a DSL?
emax at chalmers.se
Wed Oct 7 11:24:48 EDT 2009
A DSL is just a domain-specific language. It doesn't imply any specific
An *embedded* DSL is a library implemented in a more general language,
which has been designed to give the "feeling" of a stand-alone language.
Still nothing about implementation.
A *shallow embedding* of a DSL is when the "evaluation" is done
immediately by the functions and combinators of the DSL. I don't think
it's possible to draw a line between a combinator library and a
shallowly embedded DSL.
A *deep embedding* is when interpretation is done on an intermediate
Günther Schmidt skrev:
> Hi all,
> for people that have followed my posts on the DSL subject this question
> probably will seem strange, especially asking it now.
> I have read quite a lot lately on the subject, most of it written by the
> great old ones, (come on guys you know whom I mean :)).
> What I could gather from their papers was, that a DSL is basically
> something entirely abstract as such, ie. it allows you build and combine
> expressions in a language which is specific for your problem domain.
> Irregardless of further details on how to do that, and there are quite a
> few, the crux as such is that they are abstract of "meaning".
> The meaning depends how you *evaluate* the expression, which can be in
> more than merely one way, which is where, as far as I understand it, the
> true power lies.
> So, you might wonder, since I figured it out this far, why ask what a
> DSL is?
> Because out there I see quite a lot of stuff that is labeled as DSL, I
> mean for example packages on hackage, quite useuful ones too, where I
> don't see the split of assembling an expression tree from evaluating it,
> to me that seems more like combinator libraries.
> What is a DSL?
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
More information about the Haskell-Cafe