[Haskell-cafe] What's the deal with Clean?
gcross at phys.washington.edu
Wed Nov 4 00:16:48 EST 2009
So I take it you are saying that it really *cleans* Haskell's clock
when it comes to speed? ;-)
On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:04 PM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
> On Nov 4, 2009, at 9:30 AM, Deniz Dogan wrote:
>> So what's the deal with Clean? Why is it preferable to Haskell? Why
>> is it not?
> (1) Speed.
> (2) If you are a Windows developer, the fact that Windows is the
> platform and others (even Mac OS, which is historically ironic) are
> second- (or in the case of Solaris) third-class citizens.
> (3) Did I mention speed?
> (4) It comes with its own IDE. I don't think it can do anything
> much that
> Haskell tools can't do, but if you don't like looking for things,
> a help.
> (5) Plus of course there's speed.
> (6) They're working on a Haskell front end, so you won't actually
> have to
> choose. (Anyone doing a Clean front end for Haskell?)
> (7) Haskell now has bang-patterns so you can specify (a bound on)
> strictness when you declare a function. But that's not in
> Haskell 98.
> (8) As a result of this, speed is a bit more "declarative" than adding
> $! in strange places.
> (9) There's a theorem prover for Clean, called Sparkle.
> Sadly, it's Windows-only, but we all know what most computers on
> planet run, don't we? (It's probably Symbian, actually.)
> (10) And finally, of course, there's speed. Did I mention that?
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
More information about the Haskell-Cafe