[Haskell-cafe] Yampa vs. Reactive

[Thomas Davie]

On 21 Dec 2008, at 13:10, Henrik Nilsson wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
> > In reactive, one doesn't.  All behaviors and events have the same
> > absolute 0 value for time.
>
> Right. I believe the possibility of starting behaviors later
> is quite important.
>
> And from what Conal wrote in a related mail, I take it that this
> is recognized, and that this capability is something that is
> being considered for reactive?

Yep, it is indeed.

Thanks for this series of emails by the way.  It's helped clarify in  
my head exactly what problems Yampa solved, and exactly which of them  
Reactive does or doesn't solve.

Thanks

Tom Davie