[Haskell-cafe] Yampa vs. Reactive
tom.davie at gmail.com
Mon Dec 22 03:19:54 EST 2008
On 21 Dec 2008, at 13:10, Henrik Nilsson wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> > In reactive, one doesn't. All behaviors and events have the same
> > absolute 0 value for time.
> Right. I believe the possibility of starting behaviors later
> is quite important.
> And from what Conal wrote in a related mail, I take it that this
> is recognized, and that this capability is something that is
> being considered for reactive?
Yep, it is indeed.
Thanks for this series of emails by the way. It's helped clarify in
my head exactly what problems Yampa solved, and exactly which of them
Reactive does or doesn't solve.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe