[Haskell-cafe] Building "production stable" software in Haskell

[Adrian Hey]

Andrew Coppin wrote:
> If something is broken, it should be fixed. If something isn't broken, I 
> see no reason to change it. You might call that "stagnation", but I view 
> it as something else...

Nobody is talking about changing anything, at least not Data.Map.

We're talking about why alternatives to Data.Map are apparently
rejected out of hand for stupid, trivial and arbitrary reasons.

Regards
--
Adrian Hey