[Haskell-cafe] Re: Is "take" behaving correctly?

Neil Mitchell ndmitchell at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 04:50:26 EDT 2007


> Although I appluad the semantics of the safe package, I'm not delighted
> with the idea of replacing our concise elegant standard library names
> with uglyAndRatherLongCamelCaseNamesThatCouldBePerlOrEvenJava though.
> Conciseness of expression is a virtue.

They aren't that long - merely an extra 4 characters over the standard
one to indicate what the specific semantics are. If you can think of
better names, then I'm happy to make use of them.



More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list