[Haskell-cafe] Custom unary operator extension?
bf3 at telenet.be
Sun Sep 9 13:02:37 EDT 2007
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2007, at 9:09 , Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
>>> I think that the benefits of prefix or postfix symbolic operators
>>> were not worth dispensing with the comfortable section syntax.
>> Well, that's personal I guess, but I would prefer the syntax (? /
>> 100) and (100 / ?), which is just a single extra character to type,
>> and hence allow unary operators, but hey, that's just me, the newbie ;-)
> I think I'd prefer _ instead of ? there, because it already has the
> meaning of "placeholder".
Indeed, much better!
More information about the Haskell-Cafe