[Haskell-cafe] Custom unary operator extension?
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
allbery at ece.cmu.edu
Sun Sep 9 09:22:30 EDT 2007
On Sep 9, 2007, at 9:09 , Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
>> I think that the benefits of prefix or postfix symbolic operators
>> were not worth dispensing with the comfortable section syntax.
> Well, that's personal I guess, but I would prefer the syntax (? /
> 100) and (100 / ?), which is just a single extra character to type,
> and hence allow unary operators, but hey, that's just me, the
> newbie ;-)
I think I'd prefer _ instead of ? there, because it already has the
meaning of "placeholder".
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery at kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
More information about the Haskell-Cafe