[Haskell-cafe] Extending the idea of a general Num to other types?

Henning Thielemann lemming at henning-thielemann.de
Mon Sep 3 09:15:04 EDT 2007

On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Lennart Augustsson wrote:

> You're right.  The list syntax is only for lists in Haskell.  It would be
> nice if the list syntax was overloaded too.

The special list syntax isn't as good, as always proposed. I have
collected some advantages of the bare infix notation:

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list