[Haskell-cafe] Extending the idea of a general Num to other types?
lemming at henning-thielemann.de
Mon Sep 3 09:15:04 EDT 2007
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
> You're right. The list syntax is only for lists in Haskell. It would be
> nice if the list syntax was overloaded too.
The special list syntax isn't as good, as always proposed. I have
collected some advantages of the bare infix notation:
More information about the Haskell-Cafe