[Haskell-cafe] Re: PROPOSAL: New efficient Unicode string library.
stefanor at cox.net
Tue Oct 2 16:53:15 EDT 2007
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:02:30AM -0700, Deborah Goldsmith wrote:
> UTF-16 is the type used in all the APIs. Everything else is considered an
> encoding conversion.
> CoreFoundation uses UTF-16 internally except when the string fits entirely
> in a single-byte legacy encoding like MacRoman or MacCyrillic. If any kind
> of Unicode processing needs to be done to the string, it is first coerced
> to UTF-16. If it weren't for backwards compatibility issues, I think we'd
> use UTF-16 all the time as the machinery for switching encodings adds
> complexity. I wouldn't advise it for a new library.
I do not believe that anyone was seriously advocating multiple blessed
encodings. The main question is *which* encoding to bless. 99+% of
text I encounter is in US-ASCII, so I would favor UTF-8. Why is UTF-16
better for me?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20071002/81a95a11/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Haskell-Cafe