[Haskell-cafe] Type system madness
andrewcoppin at btinternet.com
Fri Jul 13 15:57:58 EDT 2007
Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> Andrew Coppin wrote:
>> Oh well, the problem is easily fixed... *sigh*
> I doubt that anybody minds having you talk about Haskell. You've been
> responsible for spawning a lot of interesting threads.
[And that one about compression that's still going on somewhere... lol!]
> All I would suggest is that you take your cue from the other people
> who post to the list, and try a few tactics before you post:
> - If you have a chatty one-line comment, do 2,000 other people need to
> see it?
Mmm. This is why I prefer NNTP. (If a thread becomes tangent, everybody
just marks it "ignore" and they don't have to waste time downloading it
or reading it.) But yeah, point taken...
> - If you have a question to ask, try to spend 2 minutes with Google or
> the Haskell wiki to find the anwer.
I continue to be surprised at the things that don't seem to be on the
Wiki... Google is typically no help at all with anything
Haskell-related, because Haskell is so completely obscure. The various
haddoc documentation is also frustratingly sparse in places. (E.g.,
Control.Concurrent.STM.TVar contains *nothing* but terse type
signatures. And concurrent programming is already a tricky thing to get
right.) Some things seem to be "well known" yet not actually written
down anywhere - e.g., the finer points of using "seq" to make stuff go
But sure, I do like to try to puzzle a thing out first before posting
here. (If something else, I kind of enjoy a challenge...)
> - Join us on #haskell on IRC. It's extremely chatty, and you'll be
Not in my experience, no.
(Maybe I ask the wrong way... but almost everybody seems to simply
ignore me. Actually, usually when I go there absolutely nobody is
speaking at all. What time zone do these people live in?)
More information about the Haskell-Cafe