magnus at therning.org
Tue Jan 9 05:28:37 EST 2007
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:51:06 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote:
>Overall, I like the gems approach. The Ruby packages for debian-alikes
>are almost invariably out of date and building a lot of these Ruby
>enhancements is a pain in the posterior. If I want a stable version of
>a given component, I'll use aptitude (or RPM or whatever) and live with
>it being out of date. If I want the latest and greatest, however, I'll
>stick to the gems. Since gems can be installed and deleted just like
>aptitude's packages can be (and just as cleanly) it really isn't that
>hard an approach.
Just out of curiousity, does 'gem' work with 'checkinstall'?
Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
magnus at therning.org Jabber: magnus.therning at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20070109/aeaee2a4/attachment.bin
More information about the Haskell-Cafe