[Haskell-cafe] Is StateT what I need?

[Stuart Cook]

On Dec 19, 2007 11:28 AM, Andre Nathan <andre at digirati.com.br> wrote:
> I guess I could do away with StateT and just pass the PsMap around as a
> parameter, but I guess that wouldn't be the haskell way...

I wouldn't say that. Manual state-passing is a perfectly legitimate
technique, and can be clearer in some cases.

Once your program works with manual state-passing, you might then find
it easier to express using StateT -- or perhaps you'll decide that you
didn't need StateT after all.


Stuart