[Haskell-cafe] Haskell purity and printing

Nicolas Frisby nicolas.frisby at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 16:17:29 EST 2007

> Note that your h does not differentiate between f and g (in fact, it
> does not investigate them at all), the only thing you can do with f,
> g, (h f), and (g f) is apply them. Accordingly, it's a fine Haskell
> definition.

Errr... (h g), not (g f)

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list