[Haskell-cafe] Shootout favoring imperative code
haskell at list.mightyreason.com
Fri Jan 6 04:55:26 EST 2006
Brent Fulgham wrote:
> --- Chris Kuklewicz <haskell at list.mightyreason.com>
>>Also about sum-file: They do not reveal what the
>>actual 8k test file contains. So there is no way
>>to reproduce the benchmark locally for testing.
>>(One can learn it totals 400000, but since
>>negative numbers are allowed, this does not help
> It's created by catting the example file together
> multiple times. I'll update the page to be more clear
> this, and I can send you the actual file used on the
> machine if you want.
That is what I did as a hack. Nice to see I guessed right. Right now I
use a 1,680,000 line (concatenated) version to get the processing times
large enough to discern small improvements.
>>Apparantly it is bottlenecked by parsing strings
>>into integers, but they specify "Programs should use
>>built-in line-oriented I/O functions rather
>>than custom-code." which means the programmer's
>>hands are completely tied. So it is just a
> benchmark of the
>>build-in library function, not
>>of any algorithm the programmer provides.
> Yes -- it was designed as a test of the standard I/O
I assumed that that I could use getContents, like the previously
accepted Haskell entry. It returns the entire stdin as a single (lazy)
string, so it is technically not "line oriented". But it is certainly a
"standard I/O system" for Haskell. I'll submit my improved version soon.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe