Biggest Haskell unit in the world
Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:57:30 +1000 (EST)
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, C T McBride wrote:
> But this is the stuff of too much cheese at bedtime. These dreams won't
> come true without strong economic pressure...which leads me to this
> question, given it's the marking season: which programming language lends
> itself most easily to automated analysis of student code?
I find Haskell scripts are well suited at least to automated _testing_.
In my small class (50 students) I test all assignments using Hugs and a
test script which exercises the students' functions and computes a
BTW I teach a "programming languages" course which includes an
introduction to Haskell and an introduction to parsing and compiling.
The students modify an interpreter that I wrote. The complete Haskell
source for the language (simple block structured imperative language
with a single integer daya type) is only 600 lines, of which about half
is the parser. This compares favourably with a similar toy compiler in
C++ that was used before I took over the course --- it ran to well over
Dr Richard Watson email@example.com
Dept of Mathematics & Computing phone: +61 7 4631 5546
University of Southern Queensland FAX: +61 7 4631 5555
Toowoomba Qld 4350, AUSTRALIA http://www.sci.usq.edu.au