On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:27:29 +0100 Daan Leijen <daanleijen@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Just for the record: this is *not* true for most (all?) event > based implementations as they are *not* concurrent (at least not > pre-emptively concurrent). Ok, and that's why I can't be left alone doing something serious ;) Sorry about this! V.