Feedback on -Wredundant-constraints

[Carter Schonwald]

Either way, do we have a strong agreement that for ghc 8.2 that this
warning should be split up and the noiser part should be moved out of the
default wall set?

On Monday, June 6, 2016, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com>
wrote:

> To better elaborate :  I definitely want this for the next major version
> i.e. 8.2.* , but I'm also wondering if perhaps the "overly constrained
> type" warning should be flat out removed from Wall even in ghc 8.0.2,
>
> On Monday, June 6, 2016, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','carter.schonwald at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> It's a tall ask, but why not?
>> On Jun 6, 2016 12:16 PM, "Eric Seidel" <eric at seidel.io> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016, at 07:37, Carter Schonwald wrote:
>>> > I don't suppose there's any hope of having this resolved prior to GHC
>>> 8.2
>>> > because it is a real usability regression? Because I think we can all
>>> > agree
>>> > that the proposed change would not break any 8.0 series code, and
>>> > positively impact everyone.
>>>
>>> Do you mean prior to 8.0.2?
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
>>> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
>>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20160611/d5399b74/attachment.html>