Feedback on -Wredundant-constraints

[Carter Schonwald]

To better elaborate :  I definitely want this for the next major version
i.e. 8.2.* , but I'm also wondering if perhaps the "overly constrained
type" warning should be flat out removed from Wall even in ghc 8.0.2,

On Monday, June 6, 2016, Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com>
wrote:

> It's a tall ask, but why not?
> On Jun 6, 2016 12:16 PM, "Eric Seidel" <eric at seidel.io
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','eric at seidel.io');>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016, at 07:37, Carter Schonwald wrote:
>> > I don't suppose there's any hope of having this resolved prior to GHC
>> 8.2
>> > because it is a real usability regression? Because I think we can all
>> > agree
>> > that the proposed change would not break any 8.0 series code, and
>> > positively impact everyone.
>>
>> Do you mean prior to 8.0.2?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
>> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org');>
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20160606/c3c9fb7a/attachment.html>