Rethinking GHC's approach to managing proposals

asyropoulos at asyropoulos at
Sun Jul 10 13:58:34 UTC 2016

 >Recently there has been a fair bit of discussion[1,2] around the
>mechanisms by which proposed changes to GHC are evaluated. While we have
>something of a formal proposal protocol [3], it is not clearly
>documented, inconsistently applied, and may be failing to serve a
>significant fraction of GHC's potential contributor pool.
I think the best thing to do is to fork the source code and modify it according
to one's own needs. Having some sort of committees to decide about the
syntax, etc. is a really bad idea. 


Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list