Overlapping and incoherent instances

[Simon Peyton Jones]

CAN_OVERLAP and CAN_BE_OVERLAPPED?

(instead of OVERLAPPING and OVERLAPPABLE)

Or CAN-OVERLAP, CAN-BE-OVERLAPPED

That’s ok with me if that’s what you all want!

Simon

From: Glasgow-haskell-users [mailto:glasgow-haskell-users-bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Skrzetnicki
Sent: 29 July 2014 16:56
To: Brandon Allbery
Cc: Simon Peyton Jones; Andreas Abel; GHC users; Haskell Libraries (libraries at haskell.org); ghc-devs
Subject: Re: Overlapping and incoherent instances


How about CAN_OVERLAP?

--
Krzysztof
29-07-2014 15:40, "Brandon Allbery" <allbery.b at gmail.com<mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com>> napisał(a):
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andreas Abel <andreas.abel at ifi.lmu.de<mailto:andreas.abel at ifi.lmu.de>> wrote:
+1. I like Niklas' syntax better.  Also OVERLAPPABLE is a horrible word, OVERLAPPING sound less formidable (even though it might be slightly less accurrate).

We already get "overlap ok" in instance-related type errors, so OVERLAP_OK wouldn't be particularly alien even if it doesn't quite fit in with existing pragmas.

--
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com<mailto:allbery.b at gmail.com>                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net<mailto:ballbery at sinenomine.net>
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries at haskell.org<mailto:Libraries at haskell.org>
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20140729/2d24779a/attachment-0001.html>