default roles
Richard Eisenberg
eir
Thu Oct 10 03:18:35 UTC 2013
On Oct 9, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
>
> So the conclusion is indeed: Let type class constraints have a nominal
> role, and all is fine.
But, then it would seem that any class with a superclass wouldn't be compatible with GND. Do you see that detail as a consequence of this design?
I think this approach might work, but I'm not yet convinced.
Richard
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list