Marking type constructor arguments as nominal (e.g. Set)
Nicolas Frisby
nicolas.frisby at gmail.com
Sun Aug 18 22:54:55 CEST 2013
Non-injectivity of type families sometimes hinders type inference. Consider
> Set' (Set.singleton 'c')
Naively, we only know that (Char ~ NominalArg a). Since type families are
not necessarily injective, this usually means we cannot determine the type
variable `a' from this constraint. However, since the NominalArg instance
is parametric in `a', I suspect GHC might successfully infer (Char ~ a) in
this case.
… A quick ghci test confirms that GHC does infer (Char ~ a) here. I
apologize for not just experimenting in the first place, but maybe this
email will save someone slightly more time than is required to read it. :P
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Joachim Breitner
<mail at joachim-breitner.de>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not sure – where would injectivity be needed?
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
> Am Sonntag, den 18.08.2013, 15:00 -0500 schrieb Nicolas Frisby:
> > Is the non-injectivity not an issue here because the type family
> > application gets immediately simplified?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Joachim Breitner
> > <mail at joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > now that roles are in HEAD, I could play around a bit with it.
> > They were
> > introduced to solve the unsoundness of newtype deriving, but
> > there is
> > also the problem of abstraction: If I define a set type based
> > on an ord
> > instance, e.g.
> >
> > data Set a = Set a -- RHS here just for demonstration
> >
> > the I don’t want my users to replace a "Set Int" by a "Set
> > (Down Int)",
> > even though the latter is a newtype of the former. This can be
> > prevented
> > by forcing the role of "a" to be Nominal (and not
> > Representational, as
> > it is by default). What I just noticed is that one does not
> > even have to
> > introduce new syntax for it, one can just use:
> >
> > type family NominalArg x
> > type instance (NominalArg x) = x
> > data Set' a = Set' (NominalArg a)
> >
> > and get different roles; here the excerpt from --show-iface
> > (is there an
> > easier way to see role annotations):
> >
> > 5b7b2f7c3883ef0d9fc7934ac56c4805
> > data Set a at R
> > [..]
> > 8e15d783d58c18b8205191ed3fd87e27
> > data Set' a at N
> >
> > The type family does not get into the way, e.g.
> >
> > conv (Set a) = Set' a
> >
> > works as usual.
> >
> > (I now also notice that the parser actually supports role
> > annotations...
> > but still a nice, backward-compatible trick here).
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Joachim
> >
> > --
> > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
> > mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> > Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C
> > Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> > Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> > Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
> --
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
> mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C
> Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20130818/750d50ec/attachment.htm>
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list