Why I Want Global Field Names (By Default)

[Tom Murphy]

+1
On Mar 6, 2012 11:24 AM, "Simon Marlow" <marlowsd at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 05/03/2012 11:06, AntC wrote:
>
>> Gershom Bazerman<gershomb<at>  gmail.com>  writes:
>>
>>      ...  If everyone finds this agreeable (and I can
>>>     imagine no reason they wouldn't!) ...
>>>
>>
>> That's a misleading remark: you're asking people to agree to a half-baked
>> and
>> sketchy proposal.
>>
>
> I wonder if we might all stop and take a deep breath at this point.  The
> debate is getting a little more heated than we're used to on this mailing
> list.
>
> There's lots of great discussion going on, and sadly for myself I think
> I'm missing a lot of the fine details of the debate because of the volume.
>  So can I ask people to take a little more time when concocting their
> replies, read it over a couple of times, see if it can't be condensed a bit
> - and above all, let's be civilized.  This is Haskell, and we're proud of
> our community.
>
> Cheers,
>        Simon
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.**org <Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org>
> http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/glasgow-**haskell-users<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20120306/a2a2ae87/attachment.htm>