Why I Want Global Field Names (By Default)
marlowsd at gmail.com
Tue Mar 6 17:22:36 CET 2012
On 05/03/2012 11:06, AntC wrote:
> Gershom Bazerman<gershomb<at> gmail.com> writes:
>> ... If everyone finds this agreeable (and I can
>> imagine no reason they wouldn't!) ...
> That's a misleading remark: you're asking people to agree to a half-baked and
> sketchy proposal.
I wonder if we might all stop and take a deep breath at this point. The
debate is getting a little more heated than we're used to on this
There's lots of great discussion going on, and sadly for myself I think
I'm missing a lot of the fine details of the debate because of the
volume. So can I ask people to take a little more time when concocting
their replies, read it over a couple of times, see if it can't be
condensed a bit - and above all, let's be civilized. This is Haskell,
and we're proud of our community.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users