Composition operator [was: Re: Records in Haskell]

Greg Weber greg at gregweber.info
Wed Jan 18 05:02:34 CET 2012


I broke out the dot operator section of the proposal to its own page since
it is actually fairly independent of the different proposals.

http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Records/DotOperator

On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 7:26 PM, wren ng thornton <wren at freegeek.org> wrote:

> On 1/13/12 11:31 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
>
>> Anyone want to hazard a guess what percentage of
>> Haskell programmers can even name every letter of the Greek alphabet?  I'm
>> betting less than 10%.
>>
>
> That's easy for anyone with a classical education (or far too much
> mathematics education). There may well be less than 10% of Haskellers who
> have such, but Greek letters are rather trivial to learn.
>
> The problems arise when suddenly everyone needs to know the names of all
> the graphemes of Cyrillic, Amharic, Mandarin, Japanese, Arabic, Hebrew,...
> (because there are a great number of writing systems, and because they are
> relatively unknown having not been coopted by the mathematical tradition)
> or when everyone needs to know the names of all the obscure symbols
> mathematicians have come up with over the years (because generally they've
> never been named in the first place).
>
> --
> Live well,
> ~wren
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.**org <Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org>
> http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/glasgow-**haskell-users<http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20120118/cdae07b0/attachment.htm>


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list