proposal: separate lists for ghc-cvs commits and ghc-dev chatter

[José Pedro Magalhães]

I have the same opinion as Ian; I'm happy with the current setup, but if
things
change I'll just subscribe to everything anyway.


Cheers,
Pedro

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Ian Lynagh <ian at well-typed.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:25:49PM +0200, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
> >
> > +1. I'd like to follow GHC development discussions, but getting all the
> > commits is too much.
>
> I'm surprised by this, FWIW. I think skimming the commits is a good way
> to get an idea of what's going on, while discussions between developers
> tend to be focussed on particular obscure points (e.g. discussing
> correctness of a murky corner in the intersection between 2 new type
> system extensions, or discussing the way PIC is handled on OSX/PowerPC)
> which I wouldn't have thought were of much interest to any party not
> involved in the discussion and familiar with the details.
>
> Anyway, I'm not really too fussed about what mailing lists we have. I'll
> just subscribe to them all anyway  :-)
>
>
> Thanks
> Ian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20121206/7c7384de/attachment.htm>