build failures when hiding non-visible imports

Brandon Allbery allbery.b at gmail.com
Sun Aug 19 17:22:11 CEST 2012


On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 9:10 PM, Carter Schonwald <
carter.schonwald at gmail.com> wrote:

> meaning: flags for treating it as a warning vs as an error?  (pardon, i'm
> over thinking ambiguity in phrasing).
> if thats the desired difference, that sounds good to me!
>

I would expect it means that, having demoted it to a warning, we would have
-fwarn-hiding-no-target / -fno-warn-hiding-no-target (or whatever we call
it) as with all other warnings.

For warning vs. error, it seems to me that should be more general:  perhaps
taking any of the -f[no-]warn-* options and replacing "warn" with "err".

-- 
brandon s allbery                                      allbery.b at gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available)     (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20120819/4421b285/attachment.htm>


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list