testsuite results

[Daniel Fischer]

Continuing with today's HEAD's results:
    7506 expected passes
     235 expected failures
       0 unexpected passes
       9 unexpected failures

More failures than Friday, with fewer tests run (no profiling).

But what's the actual difference?
We have our old acquaintances
   T3064(normal)
   T5084(normal)
   dph-diophantine-opt(normal,threaded1,threaded2)
   dph-words-opt(normal)

T3016(profasm) obviously wasn't run, without profiling support.

New are:

   ds022(normal)

an overlapping pattern warning used to report the first overlapping 
patterns, now the last; the expected stderr output has been updated 
meanwhile, but my testsuite was started before that.



   3307(normal)
   environment001(normal)

These two failed with (mutatis mutandis)

Actual stderr output differs from expected:
--- /dev/null	2011-05-15 19:13:45.604004218 +0200
+++ ./lib/IO/environment001.run.stderr.normalised	2011-05-16 
12:33:18.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/bin/sh: Zeile 0: echo: Schreibfehler: Datenübergabe unterbrochen (broken 
pipe).
*** unexpected failure for environment001(normal)

I think it's the testsuite driver interacting badly with my OS, because 
running `make TEST=XY' in the testsuite directory consistently fails with a 
broken pipe, but running the tests from the .../lib/IO directory, either by 
manually issuing the commands from the command line or by running
`make XY-test', consistently succeeds (including the production of the 
correct output).


Altogether, things still look good.