testsuite results
Daniel Fischer
daniel.is.fischer at googlemail.com
Fri May 13 03:04:48 CEST 2011
On Thursday 12 May 2011 17:49:16, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | hpc_markup_multi_001(normal)
> | hpc_markup_multi_002(normal)
> | hpc_markup_multi_003(normal)
> |
> | Unexpected passes:
> | mc01(hpc,ghci)
> | mc06(hpc,ghci)
> | mc08(hpc,ghci)
> | mc11(hpc)
> | mc16(hpc)
> | mc18(hpc)
>
> I pushed patches for all of these today
>
Great!
Now I've built HEAD (7b3a746294d3d034da0052644237e4d1ab1f08c8, minus the
patch removing the import Config from AsmCodeGen, cf #5194) with profiling,
leading to
====================
OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Do 12. Mai 20:47:35 CEST 2011
2766 total tests, which gave rise to
11839 test cases, of which
0 caused framework failures
2123 were skipped
9428 expected passes
280 expected failures
1 unexpected passes
7 unexpected failures
====================
Unexpected passes:
conc016(threaded2)
Well, that one occasionally happens.
====================
Unexpected failures:
T3016(profasm)
timeout-killed, too much other stuff running, rerunning T3016 on a less
busy machine made it pass, but I'm not too happy with the stats:
<<ghc: 29262116704 bytes, 55739 GCs, 88426196/318733428 avg/max bytes
residency (35 samples), 668M in use, 0.00 INIT (0.00 elapsed), 81.46 MUT
(104.38 elapsed), 42.76 GC (103.41 elapsed) :ghc>>
====================
T3064(normal)
This one failed due to ghc being too good:
bytes allocated 59305220 is less than minimum allowed 65000000
If this is because you have improved GHC, please
update the test so that GHC doesn't regress again
*** unexpected failure for T3064(normal)
On an almost idle machine, the figures are even lower:
[("bytes allocated", "58378436")
,("num_GCs", "30")
,("average_bytes_used", "1594860")
,("max_bytes_used", "3064640")
,("num_byte_usage_samples", "2")
,("peak_megabytes_allocated", "8")
,("init_cpu_seconds", "0.00")
,("init_wall_seconds", "0.00")
,("mutator_cpu_seconds", "0.16")
,("mutator_wall_seconds", "0.17")
,("GC_cpu_seconds", "0.07")
,("GC_wall_seconds", "0.07")
]
====================
T5084(normal)
dph-diophantine-opt(normal,threaded1,threaded2)
The same as before, nothing to worry about.
====================
dph-words-opt(normal)
This one was also timeout-killed on a busy machine, a later re-run let the
compilation finish, but it took quite long:
[1 of 2] Compiling WordsVect ( WordsVect.hs, WordsVect.o )
[2 of 2] Compiling Main ( Main.hs, Main.o )
Linking dph-words-opt ...
<<ghc: 52843523420 bytes, 101270 GCs, 53522750/118551624 avg/max bytes
residency (67 samples), 282M in use, 0.00 INIT (0.01 elapsed), 153.19 MUT
(163.87 elapsed), 70.10 GC (70.05 elapsed) :ghc>>
The run of the programme again ended with an invalid slice.
====================
> | Summing up: Yay!
>
> Indeed!
Still very much yay, I can't find the new unexpected failure of T3064
disappointing in the least, only T3016(profasm) and dph-words-opt leave
something to be desired.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list