allbery.b at gmail.com
Wed Aug 3 06:40:26 CEST 2011
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 00:31, John Lask <jvlask at hotmail.com> wrote:
> What is really required is a "pluggable" back-end infrastructure - whereby
> various back-ends could be maintained (or not) at the discretion of their
> originators and separate to the official ghc back-ends.
I guess I'm confused; I thought the current back-end system *was* that kind
of pluggable architecture. I recall a JVM backend being proposed based on
it some time back.
brandon s allbery allbery.b at gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users