GHCJS

[Brandon Allbery]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 00:31, John Lask <jvlask at hotmail.com> wrote:

> What is really required is a "pluggable" back-end infrastructure - whereby
> various back-ends could be maintained (or not) at the discretion of their
> originators and separate to the official ghc back-ends.
>

I guess I'm confused; I thought the current back-end system *was* that kind
of pluggable architecture.  I recall a JVM backend being proposed based on
it some time back.

-- 
brandon s allbery                                      allbery.b at gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available)     (412) 475-9364 vm/sms
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20110803/95189af3/attachment-0001.htm>