The firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
redcom at fedoms.com
Tue Oct 20 12:24:27 EDT 2009
would that move preserve the archive?
Am 20.10.2009, 16:37 Uhr, schrieb Simon Peyton-Jones
<simonpj at microsoft.com>:
> Question: is the template-haskell at haskell.org mailing list still useful?
> * It has 250 subscribers compared to 850 for ghc-users.
> * It has low traffic
> * template-haskell is the only GHC-specific mailing list associated
> with a particular
> language feature. Eg type functions, ghci, etc do not have their
> own list
> * The traffic on ghc-users is not dauntingly high.
> I suggest we abolish it in favour of ghc-users. Any dissenters? (I'd
> emit a warning, so that people could check they are subscribed to
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users