Loop unrolling + fusion ?

Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH allbery at ece.cmu.edu
Mon Mar 9 23:40:00 EDT 2009

On 2009 Mar 9, at 9:32, Claus Reinke wrote:
> One way out would be to treat the whole mutual recursion as a single  
> entity, either implicitly, as I indicated, or explicitly, as I  
> interpret Brandon's somewhat ambiguous comment. In other words, the  
> peel/unroll limits would apply to a whole group of mutually

Sorry, yes, I intended that the unrolling applied explicitly to a  
group of mutually recursive functions.  I'm not sure if the unroll/ 
peel counts should be multiplied by the number of functions, though.

brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery at kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university    KF8NH

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20090309/b72d6359/PGP.bin

More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list