Loop unrolling + fusion ?
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
allbery at ece.cmu.edu
Mon Mar 9 23:40:00 EDT 2009
On 2009 Mar 9, at 9:32, Claus Reinke wrote:
> One way out would be to treat the whole mutual recursion as a single
> entity, either implicitly, as I indicated, or explicitly, as I
> interpret Brandon's somewhat ambiguous comment. In other words, the
> peel/unroll limits would apply to a whole group of mutually
Sorry, yes, I intended that the unrolling applied explicitly to a
group of mutually recursive functions. I'm not sure if the unroll/
peel counts should be multiplied by the number of functions, though.
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery at kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20090309/b72d6359/PGP.bin
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users