How bad is the PowerPC backend?
Tim Chevalier
catamorphism at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 16:11:25 EST 2009
On 2/9/09, Bulat Ziganshin <bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
>
> Monday, February 9, 2009, 11:16:22 PM, you wrote:
>
> > So is the PPC backend really this bad, or should I be looking for
> > something weird with the hardware or configuration on the Mac?
>
>
> check GC times too. one possibility is that GC takes much more time
> due to smaller L2 cache
>
Hmm, doesn't seem to be happening with this example. On the Mac, I get
(running with +RTS -s -RTS):
11.86 MUT time (13.95s elapsed)
0.08s GC time (0.15s elapsed)
%GC time 0.6% (1.1% elapsed)
and on the PC:
1.07s MUT time (1.34s elapsed)
0.01s GC time (0.02s elapsed)
%GC time 1.1% (1.6% elapsed)
so GC doesn't seem to explain the large difference in running times.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Chevalier * http://cs.pdx.edu/~tjc * Often in error, never in doubt
"Maybe I don't want to meet someone who shares my interests. I hate my
interests." -- Ghost World
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list