Haddock, .lhs, and GHC
duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Mon Jun 16 15:06:22 EDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 15:39 +0100, Alistair Bayley wrote:
> > I never thought about that. I've been using Setup.hs with "#!/usr/bin/env
> > runhaskell" and never had any problems.
> > I guess the only thing that would be gained by using Setup.lhs is the
> > ability to compile the setup program. Is that something that's commonly
> > done?
> That's what I do. My normal install procedure is:
> ghc --make setup
> setup configure
> setup build
> setup install
Though of course these days we can just:
It compiles Setup.(l)hs if necessary or for build types other than
Custom it can just do it directly without going via the Setup script.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users