ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.6.1
ndmitchell at gmail.com
Sat Apr 28 16:35:18 EDT 2007
> > Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a
> alternative way may be inclusion of instructions how to add c++ compiler
> to ghc installation - it's not trivial because one need to know which
> gcc version should be used and which files copied
Since I know that Bulat is the one always asking for a size reduction
in the installer, why not have a minimal installer (without c++), and
an extra-utils installer (with c++). Once GHC no longer requires C on
Windows, we can move C compilation from minimal to extra.
Of course, this requires installer hacking.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users