Is this test summary good or bad?

[Donald Bruce Stewart]

dons:
> joelr1:
> > Folks,
> > 
> > I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.7 on Intel. This is the result of running  
> > the ghc-regress suite of tests using a freshly updated ghc 6.5  that  
> > was bootstrapped using a binary distribution.
> > 
> > I suspect the framework failures were cases where tests got hung and  
> > I had to Ctrl-C them to let testing continue. I'm not sure, though.
> > 
> > OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Sun Jul  9 19:02:59 BST 2006
> >     1090 total tests, which gave rise to
> >     4985 test cases, of which
> >       13 caused framework failures
> >     1003 were skipped
> > 
> >     3460 expected passes
> >       22 expected failures
> >        0 unexpected passes
> >      448 unexpected failures
> > 
> 
> Generally ok, except ghc is broken for some reason.

Oooops :)

ghc_i_ is broken for some reason. ghc looked ok :)

> Using the wrong stage for the test? You'll need to use the stage2 ghc.
> 
> -- Don
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users