Is this test summary good or bad?

[Donald Bruce Stewart]

joelr1:
> Folks,
> 
> I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.7 on Intel. This is the result of running  
> the ghc-regress suite of tests using a freshly updated ghc 6.5  that  
> was bootstrapped using a binary distribution.
> 
> I suspect the framework failures were cases where tests got hung and  
> I had to Ctrl-C them to let testing continue. I'm not sure, though.
> 
> OVERALL SUMMARY for test run started at Sun Jul  9 19:02:59 BST 2006
>     1090 total tests, which gave rise to
>     4985 test cases, of which
>       13 caused framework failures
>     1003 were skipped
> 
>     3460 expected passes
>       22 expected failures
>        0 unexpected passes
>      448 unexpected failures
> 

Generally ok, except ghc is broken for some reason.
Using the wrong stage for the test? You'll need to use the stage2 ghc.

-- Don