simonpj at microsoft.com
Tue Aug 9 10:07:37 EDT 2005
| SPJ> Actually using C-- itself as an output medium keeps slipping down
| SPJ> agenda, mainly because no one asks for it!
| because you don't advertise it! :) if you will advertise the
| following, preferably with less or more concrete numbers, then we will
| know whether we want it or not. just asking "whether you want to have
| or C-- compilation path?" is not enough
Fair point. I have not advertised it because it doesn't currently work.
I'm not sure what priority to give it. We will use qc--, certainly. It
isn't optimised for good code, so we will certainly keep the C and asm
routes for the foreseeable future.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users