C--

[Simon Peyton-Jones]

| SPJ> Actually using C-- itself as an output medium keeps slipping down
the
| SPJ> agenda, mainly because no one asks for it!
| 
| because you don't advertise it! :)  if you will advertise the
| following, preferably with less or more concrete numbers, then we will
| know whether we want it or not. just asking "whether you want to have
C
| or C-- compilation path?" is not enough

Fair point.  I have not advertised it because it doesn't currently work.
I'm not sure what priority to give it.  We will use qc--, certainly. It
isn't optimised for good code, so we will certainly keep the C and asm
routes for the foreseeable future.

Simon