jyp_7 at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 2 15:23:17 EST 2004
--- Stefan Reich <doc at drjava.de> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> is there a Haskell collections framework suitable
> for practical use?
There's the Edison framework. From what I understand,
it is currently in a zombie state of development.
I understand it is maintained as part of the Haskell
> searched the Net and didn't really find anything.
> I'm growing tired of
> remembering the various (and partially inconsistent)
> function names for
> lists, sets, finite maps, arrays, ... For starters,
> take lookup and
> lookupFM, which differ in argument order.
I'm currently working on a proposal to integrate a
better collection library in the standard hierarchy.
It consists to "uniformise" the DData library by Daan
Leijen. Check its interface/doc at
The source code is available too.
Any comment is more than welcome. (I cound't resist to
> Such a framework will probably have to use GHC
> extensions (Collects c e
> | c -> e), which is fine for me.
> If there is no such framework, it is high time to
> write one!
My proposal does not rely on classes. (Edison does)
This, because there is no general agreement on the
best framework. Besides, it might be needed to
re-think already well established parts of the
standard: arrays, and maybe lists.
Check the libraries list archive for the recent thread
"DData in hierachical libraries". (Which list would
suit better this one thread I think)
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users