duncan.coutts at worcester.oxford.ac.uk
Wed Jun 2 11:02:06 EDT 2004
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 15:45, scott west wrote:
> I'd settle for unregisterised... it seems every time I run through the
> whole port process I see to do some new wrong thing each time, hehe. I'm
> really just in search of a working ghc implementation for my amd64,
> registered or not (the main difference is the use of architecture
> specific registers and thus performance right?).
Some ghc nomenclature: unregistered means "half as fast as you'd like it
If you're after performance (rather than simply working), you'll need to
wait for a registered build, or if you've got the assembler hacking
skills you can help out.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users