Duncan Coutts duncan.coutts at
Wed Jun 2 11:02:06 EDT 2004

On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 15:45, scott west wrote:
> I'd settle for unregisterised... it seems every time I run through the 
> whole port process I see to do some new wrong thing each time, hehe. I'm 
> really just in search of a working ghc implementation for my amd64, 
> registered or not (the main difference is the use of architecture 
> specific registers and thus performance right?).

Some ghc nomenclature: unregistered means "half as fast as you'd like it
to be".

If you're after performance (rather than simply working), you'll need to
wait for a registered build, or if you've got the assembler hacking
skills you can help out.


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list